Most serious bicycle fans are familiar with this story. On a cold, snowy November day in 1927, a young racer named Tullio Campagnolo was ascending the Croce d'Aune pass in the Italian Alps when he wanted to change the gear on his bicycle, which in those days meant loosening the rear wheel's wing nuts and flipping the wheel around for a different gear. With his fingers numb from the bitter cold, Campagnolo was unable to undo the frozen wing nuts. As he lost valuable time to his rivals, he said these legendary words: "Bisogno cambiá qualcossa de drio," or "Something in the rear must change." It's one of those great stories of inventive inspiration that, if it weren't true, would have to be created.
That event led to the creation of the first bicycle quick release lever, as well as Campagnolo's first derailleur system. More than 80 years later, the quick release lever remains one of bicycling's great inventions. It is lightweight, simple, effective, and very hard to improve upon -- therefore, it is very likely doomed.
Today, mainly because of the rise of disc brakes, the shift seems to be towards thru-axles. Some have even been predicting (perhaps even calling for) the demise of quick release skewers on all but the most lowly entry-level bikes. That would be a sad day, if you ask me.
The lowly quick release skewer -- one of those little things that means a lot. Easy to overlook, but a truly important part of a good quality bicycle.
Any frequent rider knows (or should know) that all quick releases are not created equal. Let's take a look at the quick release skewer before they go away.
First off -- The Good and the Bad (and Ugly): Enclosed cam vs. Exposed cam. For decades, all quick releases were of the enclosed cam variety. The mechanism was inside a metal (usually steel) housing, protecting it from the elements. Not that it needed it very often, but it was also more than easy enough to get a couple of drops of oil into the mechanism to keep it lubricated. Some time around the mid-80s, manufacturers started "improving" the simple quick release lever, introducing the exposed cam design -- making it a couple of grams lighter, and making it cheaper to produce (though sometimes selling for a premium price). It was a classic case of the industry marketing an inferior product as an "innovative upgrade." Unfortunately, these exposed cam skewers have become the norm. What's wrong with them? The larger, exposed cam applies less clamping force for the same amount of hand effort, so it is much easier to ride off with them not being closed tightly enough. On the rear of a bike with horizontal dropouts, this can be a real problem, as the torque applied in pedaling can pull the wheel out. Also, to cut weight, many of these have aluminum clamping faces which don't necessarily hold as well against the dropouts. Many of them also have aluminum shafts, which can easily become stripped if too much force is applied. No, the traditional enclosed cam quick release skewer is worth any extra grams it might weigh compared with the security and longevity it provides.
Some Good Ones:
![]() |
Although this is widely said to be a photo of Tullio Campagnolo on that very fateful day in 1927, the skeptic in me says it was more likely a re-enactment. |
Today, mainly because of the rise of disc brakes, the shift seems to be towards thru-axles. Some have even been predicting (perhaps even calling for) the demise of quick release skewers on all but the most lowly entry-level bikes. That would be a sad day, if you ask me.
The lowly quick release skewer -- one of those little things that means a lot. Easy to overlook, but a truly important part of a good quality bicycle.
Any frequent rider knows (or should know) that all quick releases are not created equal. Let's take a look at the quick release skewer before they go away.
Exposed-cam quick releases like this are unfortunately all too common today. Cheaper to make, possibly lighter, but less clamping force, and less durability. |
Some Good Ones: