I was flipping through an old bike magazine from 1973 (Bicycle Spokesman -- don't see that one often) and came across this full-page ad for the "all-new" Shimano disc brake:
No, it was not a surprise to me that disc brakes were being introduced for bikes in the early '70s. I'd seen them before. But it was just a reminder that, as always, there's nothing new out there. It was in that same decade that many cars were starting to move to disc brakes, and of course there were some who believed then -- just as now -- that what's good for cars must be good for bikes, too.
Shimano's disc brakes went through a couple of versions or generations, and were available on bikes at least throughout the '70s. Interestingly, you'd be hard-pressed to find any high-end bikes from that era that came with them (In fact, I can't think of a single one). Like Shimano's Positron index-shifting system, the disc brakes were almost always spec'd on lower-end and cheap department store bikes, even though it added to the cost of those bikes as compared to ones with regular rim brakes front and rear. Huffy and Murray had 10-speeds with the disc brake (only on the rear, I believe. I've not seen them on the front wheel). Some Sears Free-Spirit bikes had them, and J.C. Penny offered bikes with them too.
Any knowledgeable Schwinn fans probably know that Schwinn had a disc brake as well. It was introduced as an option on their Sting-Ray "Krate" series of bikes and on the Manta-Ray (a 24" wheeled Sting-Ray) in 1972-73. I don't believe it was offered on any of their 10-speeds, and the catalogs I've seen don't even list it as an option on the tandems, for which one would think it could have been marketed as a drag brake.
The Krates were supposed to make kids think they were driving a dragster, so anything that was remotely automotive was part of the image. They had a springer "suspension" fork, a 16" front wheel with a drum brake, and a big 5-speed stick shift mounted on the top tube. The rear tire was a fat car-like slick with raised white letters. The rear disc brake was a short-lived option introduced late in 1971 for the '72 model year. I've searched for some time to discover who actually made the brake for Schwinn, as many of their components were re-branded from other companies, but I was completely stymied. It was clearly not the same as the Shimano unit, and Schwinn at that point was primarily still getting its imported components from European suppliers (like brakes from Weinmann, or derailleurs from Huret for example). It's possible that it was made exclusively for Schwinn by a company like Bendix, which also made coaster brakes and some 2-speed "kickback" hubs for the company. If anybody knows who made the brake unit for Schwinn, leave a comment. It would be cool to know.
So, if disc brakes were so great and apparently all the rage, why didn't they catch on?
I can't speak from experience, since I've never ridden a bike with these early disc brakes, but I can only imagine they didn't live up to the promises. They also look like they were heavy as hell, so they certainly weren't going to be found on higher end bikes. Another thing to notice is the ad copy that says "It offers a smooth, shock-free braking force that prevents the wheel from locking and skidding." I don't know what they mean by "shock-free" braking (something to do with grabbiness?) but if the brakes couldn't be locked up, how powerful could they have been? Going along with that, these rear-wheel-only disc brakes play into the false notion that one overwhelmingly finds with entry-level bike riders -- that braking on the front is dangerous, and the rear wheel should be the main brake. The opposite is true, but many inexperienced riders were convinced that a strong brake on the front would lead to taking a header over the bars.
No doubt that today's disc brakes are much better than these early versions. And today's discs aren't likely to disappear like some fad after a few years. Nevertheless, even though these early discs shown here are old enough to be called "retro," they aren't anything for a retrogrouch.
 |
| "A disc brake from Shimano! It is the new look on bicycles. When you have it on your bike you've really got it made" Odd that the main selling point seems to be style more than function. |
Shimano's disc brakes went through a couple of versions or generations, and were available on bikes at least throughout the '70s. Interestingly, you'd be hard-pressed to find any high-end bikes from that era that came with them (In fact, I can't think of a single one). Like Shimano's Positron index-shifting system, the disc brakes were almost always spec'd on lower-end and cheap department store bikes, even though it added to the cost of those bikes as compared to ones with regular rim brakes front and rear. Huffy and Murray had 10-speeds with the disc brake (only on the rear, I believe. I've not seen them on the front wheel). Some Sears Free-Spirit bikes had them, and J.C. Penny offered bikes with them too.
Any knowledgeable Schwinn fans probably know that Schwinn had a disc brake as well. It was introduced as an option on their Sting-Ray "Krate" series of bikes and on the Manta-Ray (a 24" wheeled Sting-Ray) in 1972-73. I don't believe it was offered on any of their 10-speeds, and the catalogs I've seen don't even list it as an option on the tandems, for which one would think it could have been marketed as a drag brake.
 |
| (from Oldroads.com) |
 |
| The first Orange Krate, as pictured in the '68 Schwinn catalog. Notice the bike's inspiration in the background. |
So, if disc brakes were so great and apparently all the rage, why didn't they catch on?
I can't speak from experience, since I've never ridden a bike with these early disc brakes, but I can only imagine they didn't live up to the promises. They also look like they were heavy as hell, so they certainly weren't going to be found on higher end bikes. Another thing to notice is the ad copy that says "It offers a smooth, shock-free braking force that prevents the wheel from locking and skidding." I don't know what they mean by "shock-free" braking (something to do with grabbiness?) but if the brakes couldn't be locked up, how powerful could they have been? Going along with that, these rear-wheel-only disc brakes play into the false notion that one overwhelmingly finds with entry-level bike riders -- that braking on the front is dangerous, and the rear wheel should be the main brake. The opposite is true, but many inexperienced riders were convinced that a strong brake on the front would lead to taking a header over the bars.
No doubt that today's disc brakes are much better than these early versions. And today's discs aren't likely to disappear like some fad after a few years. Nevertheless, even though these early discs shown here are old enough to be called "retro," they aren't anything for a retrogrouch.